Best smart indoor trainers 2025: Our pick of the best direct-drive smart turbo trainers

Traditionally used to eliminate variables like weather during progress and fitness testing, the best smart indoor trainers are fast becoming an essential piece of kit. The increase in online racing and the growing social scene around third-party cycling apps like Zwift and Rouvy, are bringing a new level of enjoyment to the endeavour.

While some riders may still prefer the best bike rollers, it is generally accepted that direct-drive turbo trainers are the best tools for indoor training. For those with a dedicated space who take training seriously, one of the best smart bikes is worth considering.

So, what is a direct-drive smart trainer? Direct-drive means your bike and effort are directed straight through the trainer unit. This method allows greater data accuracy and breadth of metrics for better connectivity, along with increased realism by offering better gradient simulation and resistance from the unit.

In this guide, I have included the eight best direct-drive trainers from our testing, all conducted using Zwift. The Tacx Flux S is awarded best overall for its excellent ride feel, stability and smooth ERG mode, with the extremely popular Wahoo Kickr Core offering the best value.

We recognise that getting started with indoor training can be daunting. If you are new to this, you may find our beginner guide to Indoor training or the best cheap smart trainers guide helpful.

The Quick List

Our top-rated best direct drive smart turbo trainers

Best value direct-drive trainer

The Wahoo Kickr Core and the Tacx Flux S, despite being top performers, have little crossover. I'll blast through the fundamentals because, like the Tacx Flux S, the Wahoo Kickr Core executes these so well that it’s worth spending a bit more time on the hair-splitting points of differentiation.

Starting with the ride feel, I’d actually argue that the Core does better (in some aspects) than the flagship Kickr V5 I tested last year (although the Wahoo Kickr V6 and Wahoo Kickr Move have now surpassed this model).

How can this be? Well, my assumption is that it’s down to the weight of the flywheels. With the Kickr V5, it always felt like there was a great deal of inertia to spin up when accelerating – for me, it was a little less like riding out on the open road and a little more like that of a ‘spin bike’, with their huge fixed-gear flywheels.

The Kickr Core, with the flywheel being 5.4kg compared to the 7.3kg of the V5, felt a bit more natural for me when I was accelerating. However, this should be heavily caveated with the point that if you’re a heavier rider, you might well find the opposite.

Regarding the response to sudden changes in gradient and interval sessions with ERG mode engaged, the resistance changed smoothly and quickly. As mentioned, the Kickr Core does manage to hit points that the Tacx Flux S has missed. With an accuracy of ±2%, this is one of the cheaper entry points to high-end indoor racing.

However, there are points that let it down in comparison to the Flux S. First is the stability: these two-bar designs are much less stable than three-leg versions, and the Flux is particularly solid.

Best direct-drive trainer overall

First off, this is a really great turbo trainer. But that’s what makes this one a little frustrating, as it is just so close to being the obvious go-to for pretty much everyone. However, as it is, there will be some people for whom it’s not quite right.

With the heaviest flywheel on test, the Flux S also comes in as the heaviest trainer overall. Couple that with its unique footprint and you’ve got an incredibly stable platform – I’d say even potentially a little more stable than its big brother, the Tacx Neo 2T, which I tested last year. However, this is not a trainer for moving about regularly or stowing away. The legs don’t fold and it is very heavy.

Likewise, this entry-level model's resistance and ride feel are impressively close to the flagship model. Changes in gradient were fast and smooth, while the resistance remained steady even when climbing at a low speed and low cadence—a challenging combination for a trainer. Couple this with an ERG mode that copes well with even large differences in power. You are looking at one of the best on test.

Is there any point in buying a more expensive model?

Sadly, yes there is. But only for people with quite specific use cases.

First, the accuracy. Rated at ±3% this is the same as the Zumo. But it’s worth pointing out this doesn’t meet the ±2% cut-off for the upper echelons of Zwift racing. For most people, this isn’t a consideration – the majority of Zwift users aren’t serious racers, and it’s only a very small subsection of them who would be racing in those categories, but it’s worth being aware of.

The maximum simulated gradient might also cause some issues; at only 10%, it's considerably lower than others and won't exactly replicate some of the more iconic Zwift climbs.

Most Portable

The Elite Zumo’s spec sheet totally belies what a well rounded trainer this is. The cheapest trainer on test, it’s also the lightest and has the lightest flywheel, the claimed accuracy is joint worst at ±3% and the maximum resistance is the lowest at 1,350W. The slope simulation stands out as being the second shallowest at 12%.

Most of those points are immaterial, though. The max gradient of 12% is still more than enough for all your low cadence/high power interval needs—it’s just that you’ll be pushing a slightly larger gear than with a Tacx Neo 2T or a Wahoo Kickr. The maximum resistance of 1,350W is low compared to others, but most amateurs like myself won't be troubled by this.

So far, so good, but the flipside is that when riding in ERG mode and doing a session such as 20/40s or 10x1min—anything where there’s a big power differential—you can quite easily end up in something of a ‘death spiral’ of ever-increasing resistance as you struggle to spin your legs up to speed.

This is true of all trainers to some extent. It’s generally a good idea to spin up your cadence just before entering those intervals to give yourself a bit of a buffer. But this was a particular issue for the Zumo and was also a problem for the higher-end Direto that we tested last year, so it seems that this is a more general problem for Elite.

Overall, the Zumo is super portable thanks to its carry handle, foldable legs, and lightweight build. At the same time, it’s very stable thanks to its wide footprint, and the resistance is very nicely controlled and feels very smooth despite the smaller flywheel.

Best All-Round

The Wahoo Kickr V6 has been one of the top direct-drive trainers ever since the original model was launched 10 years ago. The recent updates have added WiFi connectivity and a smoothed ERG mode which improve the Kickr that much further, albeit incrementally rather than fundamentally.

Should your legs be able to get anywhere close to it, the maximum power of the Kickr V6 is 2,200W, it offers a simulated gradient of -10% to +20% and power accuracy of +/-1%. All impressive numbers.

Our tester found that the ride feel is impressive too; smooth and responsive with a well-tuned ERG function that does such a good job at matching your torque and cadence to your power targets that you wouldn't know it was happening if it wasn't for the numbers in front of you. The new ERG Easy Ramp gives you a bit of leeway to get going again should you dare slack off your effort for a few seconds.

As well as automatic firmware updates, integrated WiFi allows for easier and more stable connection to your devices which will help you and your system keep up with the capabilities of the training apps and the ever-more immersive virtual riding experience.

Read our full Wahoo Kickr V6 smart turbo trainer review

Best ERG mode

Naturally, being the most expensive trainer on test, Tacx also offers the most added features. Equally, by charging such a premium, Tacx has set a very high bar for itself that it now has to clear.

However, once set up, the Neo 2T does deliver a pretty unique riding experience—for one thing, it’s able to simulate the sensation of riding over cobbles, wooden boards, and other surfaces quite realistically. There’s also a large degree of inbuilt flex to better simulate the natural sway of riding outdoors.

The Neo 2T’s electromagnetic flywheel really nails the feeling of sprinting out on the road. It’s all very impressive, but realism can be more of a hindrance than a help for sprints and hard efforts. That inbuilt flex makes the turbo feel a bit of a noodly and hampered my top-end power output. Also, the lifelike mimicking of the resistance when sprinting means that you’re forced into quickly shifting through the gears, increasing the chances of a miss-shift.

The ERG mode felt very fluid, and the resistance changes felt nicely natural – even for large swings, as in a 30s on 30s easy session. A bonus is that the trainer doesn’t need to be calibrated, so you can just hop straight on and go, which is always nice. Also, the watts drop to zero pretty quickly, so it’s good for that aspect of Zwift racing, if not so good for sprinting.

Read our full Tacx Neo 2T smart turbo trainer review

Most Stable

The Saris H3 is the most pared-back of all the trainers on test. In terms of extras, there’s no option for a riser unit to lift the front wheel, and there’s no inbuilt rocking function to simulate the sway of a bike or any other novelties to add to the indoor riding experience. Instead, the Saris is all about delivering a solid platform for hard efforts – which could very well be all you're after.

Although not the heaviest, the Saris H3 is the most solid direct-drive turbo I’ve come across. That’s not to say it stays perfectly in place – not even the Tacx Neo Bike Smart does – but it represents a significant step up from other trainers. Like the Elite Direto XR-T, the resistance curve when sprinting also has a good feel to it, not requiring an excessive number of shifts as you wind up the watts.

The sensation of the ERG mode is kind of middle-of-the-road. I didn’t have any issues with death spirals of ever-increasing resistance, and the changes in resistance didn’t catch me by surprise. But it did lack a bit of a feeling of souplesse that the Tacx Neo 2T and Wahoo Kickr have been able to capture.

Onto the negatives, the fact that you have to manually perform calibration spindowns to keep the power numbers on track adds a bit of extra faff.

Overall, the Saris H3 is a solid option that undercuts both the Wahoo Kickr and Tacx Neo 2T.

Read our full Saris H3 smart turbo trainer review

Best Wahoo Kickr Core alternative

Let’s get this out of the way first: the Jet Black Volt V2 looks similar to the Wahoo Kickr Core. Coming in at the same list price, simulating the same maximum gradient and delivering the same maximum resistance, you might start to wonder if anything is different at all.

On closer inspection, the two trainers are distinct in quite a few areas. The first clue is in the weight: 15.4kg for the Jet Black Volt V2 compared to 18.0kg for the Wahoo Kickr Core. Part of that is down to the heft of the flywheel, coming in at 4.7kg for the Jet Black—the second lightest on test—compared to 5.4kg for the Wahoo Kickr Core.

The performance is also quite different – although this doesn’t reflect so well on the JetBlack. The resistance felt distinctly choppy when riding the Volt V2 on steep virtual climbs. It was like pushing through treacle between two and four o’clock on the pedal stroke, but past that, it would ease up significantly - almost slipping past - before ramping up again at two o’clock on the other crank arm.

To be fair, this wasn’t an issue when pushing higher power and cadence numbers (around 270w and 90 RPM), but the 180w and the 70 RPM that I was having these problems at aren’t ridiculously low. Even the most powerful riders ride around that level when recovering between intervals – and for others, this will be within their training zones.

Overall, the Tacx Flux S simply has a significantly better ride feel and, in those areas where the Flux S isn’t the test leader (i.e. accuracy and gradient simulation), the Volt V2 doesn’t ‘do the double’ either and so isn’t a compelling option.

Honorable Mention

Given how well the Elite Direto XR-T performs in most areas, it's a bit of a steal compared to the Wahoo Kickr and Tacx Neo 2. It is one of the top smart trainers. I found it to deliver consistent power readings, respond well to changes in virtual gradient, and have a realistic feel when I really put the hammer down.

The Direto also feels very stable, despite a noticeable lack of heft compared to other units I have used. However, it isn't the most compact; if that's what you are looking for, then the Elite Zumo is a better match.

Where Elite loses ground on the competition is its responsiveness in ERG mode and, specifically, in its being too biased towards piling on the resistance and almost being too responsive. You have to really work hard to keep a very consistent cadence as any drops saw the XR-T add what felt like far to much resistance. This would happen in 30sec on and off as well; you would have to really build the cadence to hit the 'on' without hitting a brick wall. Maybe it's me, but I certainly didn't have these issues with other units, which were a little more forgiving.

On the flip side, once you got into Zwift, it was the opposite, moving very slowly to zero and seemingly not responding whatsoever.

Now, if you're not using the ERG mode or don't plan to race your way around Watopia, then that's not really an issue, and you could actually save yourself some serious dollars over the top two.

Read our full Elite Direto XR-T smart trainer review

How we test

The Cycling Weekly team has ridden hundreds of virtual kilometres on all the smart trainers in this buyer's guide. The overall score is based on ease of setup, app connectivity, specification, and portability.

We do those in various ways. The first is to live with and use these trainers in multiple sessions. This allows us to find the base and test the trainer's ability to accurately replicate sessions and data. These findings are then cross-checked against a power meter or other forms of home trainer.

While most of our testing is completed on Zwift, allowing us repeatable reference points, we also check compatibility with other third-party indoor cycling apps where possible.

Perhaps most importantly and although subjective, we try to relay the concept of 'ride feel' - that is what pedalling feels like on the trainer during a variety of different efforts. This perhaps more than anything else, dictates how enjoyable a trainer is to use.

FAQs about smart indoor trainers