Lighter but weaker? The hidden costs of Ozempic and weight-loss drugs for endurance athletes
Why the popular semaglutide drugs may hurt your performance more than help it
Ozempic and other semaglutide medications have skyrocketed in popularity as weight-loss aids, with prescriptions surging by over 300% in the past year alone. Developed as a treatment for managing Type 2 diabetes, these medications have become household names in health and wellness circles as well. You may even know someone who's currently taking it—whether it's to control their blood sugar, shed a few pounds before their wedding or help slim down before the racing season.
Ozempic (semaglutide) is part of a class of medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, which were developed to help manage blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. Ozempic received FDA approval in 2017 and has since surged in popularity due to its weight-loss benefits, even among non-diabetic individuals. Ozempic works by mimicking the GLP-1 hormone, which regulates appetite. It suppresses appetite, slows gastric emptying and promotes feelings of fullness, often leading to reduced calorie consumption. When a person burns more calories than they consume, they are in a calorie deficit, which results in weight loss.
While these medications offer substantial health benefits for those who truly need them—such as managing Type 2 Diabetes or achieving significant weight loss when other methods have failed—their widespread adoption, now extending into endurance sports communities, raises an important question: are they safe for active individuals? Can Ozempic be a tool to help you achieve or maintain race weight?
Not all weight loss is the same
When we turn our focus to endurance athletes—such as long-distance runners, cyclists and triathletes—we know that high levels of energy are essential to compete and perform optimally. Achieving this depends heavily on proper nutrition, combined with muscular endurance, consistent training and adequate recovery.
Dr. Xavier Collazo, a DPT specialising in sports performance and rehabilitation at Tampa Bay Performance Physical Therapy, emphasises that the benefits of GLP-1 drugs must be carefully balanced against the potential risks, particularly for athletes.
“While these effects can be beneficial to those dealing with high BMIs or obesity, the endurance athlete, who requires large energy sources to perform and compete, will typically find that these effects would decrease performance to a degree,” he says.
“Not to mention the fact that when you lose weight, you do lose muscle, which is the driving force of all our movement."
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
In cycling, it’s long been believed that losing weight improves one's power-to-weight ratio a.k.a watts per kilogram. Thus, GLP-1 medications may seem like an appealing tool at first glance. However, these medications can cause muscle loss, which may negatively impact both your watts per kilogram and overall body composition. As a result, while the number on the scale might go down, your power output may decline alongside it.
The Risk of Under-fueling
Nutrition is a cornerstone of both performance and recovery. Protein is essential for muscle repair and growth, carbohydrates fuel energy needs, and healthy fats support brain function. With suppressed appetite comes the risk of under-fueling and potentially disrupting the body’s recovery processes, ultimately leading to a decline in performance.
Cycling demands a high caloric intake to sustain intense training and support recovery. The concern with Ozempic lies in its potent appetite-suppressing effects, which could cause one to unintentionally underfuel. This reduction of caloric intake can hinder the recovery process and increase the risk of overtraining and injury.
The Great Unknown
As GLP-1 medications become more widely used, research on their long-term effects is still in its early stages. With mass production and distribution relatively recent, there is much we have yet to understand about their broader implications.
“For now, in my personal opinion, I’d advise athletes to stick to more conventional methods of weight loss, working with nutritionists, dieticians, or simply structuring their training and intake better,” says Collazo.
“We know this will provide the best, natural result without the side effects of potential muscle loss, GI disturbance, and other long-term side effects that we are unaware of.”
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Liz is a freelance writer whose favorite topics include sports, health, and nutrition. She began riding road bikes five years ago and loves to dabble in local criterium races, although she gets the most joy from bike adventures with her friends and family. With a daughter on the way, she's looking forward to setting an example for how women are capable of any endeavor—and how to have fun along the way! Based in Austin, Texas, she also loves rock climbing, making art, and film photography
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
-
OnGuard RockSoild 8950 review: finally, the bike lock to stop opportunistic thefts?
This is the lock that defeated our brutal angle grinder test with barely a scratch. Rated Sold Secure Diamond, I rate and recommend it too
By Matt Ischt-Barnard Published
-
Cycling coverage is getting much more expensive in the UK – tell us what you think
Eurosport is closing down in the UK and there will be no more free-to-air Tour de France coverage in Britain from 2026
By David Bradford Published