Di Luca handed €280,000 fine
Danilo di Luca has been given an eye-watering fine of 280,000 Euros to go with his two-year ban for a positive EPO-Cera test at last year's Giro.
This move is in accordance with the UCI Anti-Doping Rule Article 326, that establishes a fine of 70% of the net annual income of a rider committing an offence punished by a suspension of two or more years.
The 2007 Giro d'Italia winner is expected to go to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to appeal both fine and ban.
Hitting Di Luca where it hurts: the wallet
Financial penalties have also been imposed on two other riders who were recently suspended by their national federations for doping offences.
Former Dauphiné Libéré winner Iñigo Landaluze and Maurizio Biondo will be charged €27,300 and €13,750 for their respective indiscretions.
RELATED LINKSIñigo Landaluze tests positive for EPODanilo di Luca positive for EPO-CeraCERA: new scourge of the peloton
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Founded in 1891, Cycling Weekly and its team of expert journalists brings cyclists in-depth reviews, extensive coverage of both professional and domestic racing, as well as fitness advice and 'brew a cuppa and put your feet up' features. Cycling Weekly serves its audience across a range of platforms, from good old-fashioned print to online journalism, and video.
-
'We were talking about going to the Giro d'Italia': Jonas Vingegaard postpones Giro-Tour attempt - for now
The Danish two-time winner of the Tour de France is seeking to regain the yellow jersey in 2025
By Chris Marshall-Bell Published
-
Why are so many women cycling in the gym, but not outside?
Gender imbalance persists in outdoor cycling, but inside, it is a different story. Isobel Duxfield explores why
By Isobel Duxfield Published