‘No evidence’ that Richard Freeman used testosterone to dope a rider, tribunal hears 

There is “no evidence” that doctor Richard Freeman gave testosterone to a rider to dope, his medical tribunal has heard.

Former Team Sky and British Cycling doctor Freeman is facing a fitness-to-practice hearing over allegations he obtained 30 sachets of the banned substance with the intention of administering it to a rider to dope.

Freeman has admitted obtaining the 30 Testogel sachets but denies the product was intended for doping, instead saying he obtained it to treat his colleague Shane Sutton’s erectile dysfunction. Sutton denies this. 

On Saturday (February 6), Freeman’s legal representation Mary O’Rourke QC gave her final submissions to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service hearing, being held in Manchester.

The Guardian reports that O’Rourke said: “Unless you have a document or an email saying: ‘I intend to do something,’ or he tells his wife or colleague: ‘I intend to use it to dope Sir Bradley Wiggins,’ or whoever, you haven’t got clear evidence or intent.

“Perhaps the Testogel went out the door, or in the sink. Maybe it did go off to somebody but they haven’t got a scrap of evidence to prove it. They can’t.” 

Freeman’s Medical Practitioners Tribunal hearing, being held in Manchester, centres around allegations Freeman ordered 30 testosterone sachets, which were delivered to British Cycling headquarters in Manchester in 2011, and then lied to cover up the order. 

He has admitted 18 of the 22 charges against him, but denies the banned substance was ordered for an athlete to dope, instead claiming he was “bullied” into ordering the testosterone by Shane Sutton to treat Sutton’s erectile dysfunction. Sutton denies this.

The General Medical Council, summing up its case against Freeman, recently claimed Freeman worked with “sleepers” in British Cycling and Team Sky to buy testosterone to help an athlete dope. 

But O’Rourke said that Freeman had cooperated fully with the tribunal and hadn’t refused to answer any questions, adding that “he was not the slippery devious, dishonest monster which the GMC’s closing submissions suggested he was.” 

The tribunal continues.